Fraud Blocker
×

Call Us Today

When the Hague Convention Applies to Child Custody in California (2026)

Home /  Blog /  When the Hague Convention Applies to Child Custody in California (2026)
Quinn & Dworakowski, LLP

When child custody battles cross international borders, legal safeguards become critical. The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction provides a legal framework to address these complex cases. Understanding when the Hague Convention applies to child custody in California can help protect parental rights and ensure that children are returned home as soon as possible, allowing custody disputes to be resolved in the appropriate jurisdiction.

Having a dedicated Orange County hague convention attorney familiar with international custody laws can make all the difference in these cases.

What Is the Hague Convention?

To shield kids from being taken by just one parent or guardian, the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction was established in 1980. It aims to guarantee the prompt return of children who have been wrongfully removed from their country of origin and the resolution of custody issues in the place where they normally dwell.

The principal aim of the Convention is to safeguard children by fostering collaboration among nations to settle these global conflicts. For the requirements of the Hague Convention to be applicable, both countries must be signatories. The United States, which includes California, has ratified the Convention, along with more than 100 other countries.

The treaty has one simple goal: return the child fast so the right court can decide custody. It does not decide who is the better parent. It only decides which country should hear the custody case.

International child abduction is not rare. The U.S. Department of State reported that it handled 739 active return cases involving 1,011 children during 2024 (U.S. Department of State Annual Report, 2025). That same year, 148 cases were resolved with the return of 217 children to the United States.

The Federal Law That Puts the Treaty to Work

A treaty alone does not give a parent a way to sue. Each country needs its own law to make the treaty work. In the United States, that law is the International Child Abduction Remedies Act, known as ICARA (22 U.S.C. §§ 9001–9011). ICARA lets a parent file a Hague petition in an American courtroom and sets the rules the court must follow.

Hague cases can be heard in either state or federal court. ICARA gives both court systems equal authority to hear a return petition.  A parent files in the place where the child is located. The choice between state and federal court can depend on the court’s schedule, the judge’s experience with international cases, and the strategy that fits the family’s situation.

Our Experience With an International Custody Case

In 2025, the firm’s founding partners, Stephane Quinn and David Dworakowski, won a Hague Convention case in federal court here in California. Their client’s one-year-old son had been taken from Italy and brought to the United States without her consent. After four days of testimony, U.S. District Judge David O. Carter ruled that the child’s home was Italy and ordered that he could return there with his mother. The court found the father had wrongfully removed the child in violation of the Hague Convention. This case shows the firm’s hands-on experience with complex, high-stakes international custody disputes.

When Does the Hague Convention Apply to Parental Child Abduction in California?

When it comes to Hague Convention proceedings, California courts first decide if the child was wrongfully removed or kept, based on the rules of the child’s country of habitual residence.

Before ordering a return, the court must decide the child’s habitual residence and whether the petitioner had custody rights. The court will order the child’s return to their home country if it finds that the removal or retention was wrongful. California courts focus on sending the child to their home jurisdiction so the custody dispute can be settled there, rather than deciding who should have custody.

The parent who files carries the first burden. They must show, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the removal or retention was wrongful (22 U.S.C. § 9003(e)). Wrongful means the child was taken or kept in a way that broke the other parent’s custody rights under the law of the home country. Once that is shown, the burden shifts to the other parent to prove a defense.

How California Courts Decide “Habitual Residence”

Habitual residence is the heart of almost every Hague case. It is the country where the child truly lived before the alleged wrongful removal or retention. The Hague Convention does not define the term, so courts decide it case by case.

In Monasky v. Taglieri, 589 U.S. 68 (2020), the U.S. Supreme Court held that habitual residence depends on the totality of the circumstances. No single fact controls. For a baby or very young child, courts look at where the child has been cared for and how settled daily life is. For an older child, courts look at school, friendships, activities, and other ties to a place.

Exceptions to Returning the Child Under the Hague Convention

The Hague Convention sets a legal foundation for the return of children, yet some exceptions may lead a California court to deny a return order. These exceptions are reviewed on an individual basis, and California courts carefully weigh the circumstances before deciding. Some defenses require a higher standard of proof. For example, the grave-risk defense must be shown by clear and convincing evidence (22 U.S.C. § 9003(e)). These exceptions can include:

  • Significant risk of harm. If returning the child would expose them to physical or psychological harm, or place them in an intolerable situation, the court may refuse the return.
  • Child’s objection. If the child is old and mature enough to clearly object to returning to their home country, the court may consider the child’s views.
  • Settled in a new environment. If the child has lived in California for more than a year and has settled into their new home, the court may deny the request for return.
  • Human rights. The court may refuse the return if it would violate basic human rights or fundamental freedoms.
  • Consent or acquiescence. If the parent asking for the return had agreed to the removal or retention, either before or after, the court may deny the request.

FAQs About When the Hague Convention Applies to Child Custody in CA

What Role Do California Courts Play in Hague Convention Cases?

California state courts can hear Hague petitions and decide whether a child was wrongfully removed or retained under the rights of the home country. The court then decides whether to return the child, taking into account any exceptions that apply. Federal district courts in California can hear these cases too.

How Does the Hague Convention Define Wrongful Removal or Retention of a Child?

Wrongful removal or retention happens when one parent takes a child from their home country, or keeps them in another country, without the other parent’s consent and in breach of custody rights. The goal is to return the child to the home country so custody can be decided under local law.

What Happens If a Country Is Not a Signatory to the Hague Convention?

If a child is taken to a country that has not joined the Hague Convention, the treaty offers no return remedy. Parents then rely on diplomatic channels through the U.S. Department of State or on the other country’s own laws. A California family court can still address custody under state law, but it cannot force another country to return the child.

What Happens If Both Parents Claim Different Countries as the Child’s ‘Habitual Residence’?

The court decides habitual residence by looking at the whole picture: how long the child lived in each country, the parents’ plans, and the child’s ties to the community.

Contact a California Family Lawyer

The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction is a treaty designed to resolve international child custody disputes. It requires that a child who was wrongfully taken to another country be returned to their home country so custody disputes can be resolved there.

Courts in California, like courts in other countries that signed the Convention, enforce the Hague Convention and provide a clear path for parents seeking the return of their children. Understanding your rights under this treaty is crucial, and having the right legal representation is key.

Our experienced Orange County family lawyers are well-versed in international custody disputes and can guide you through the Hague Convention process. Contact the offices of Quinn & Dworakowski, LLP, or call (949) 660-1400 to learn more about protecting your parental rights. We can help you get your family back on track.

Schedule Your Case Strategy Consultation

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Fields Marked With An “*” Are Required

I Have Read The Disclaimer*
contact us (949)660-1400

Recent Posts

Categories

Archives